Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines2003

Сomments

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Then I guilted her into taking me to see Terminator 3. Damnit that Female Terminator was scary, it reminded me of a person who scares me. Nice arm cannons though. Did anyone else see this movie? I have a question for you guys. If the Female Terminator could turn into fully dressed copies of people, and her clothes seemed to regenerate when she was blown up and all that other crap. Why did she even need to steal clothes in the first place? Couldnt she just have been like I need Clothes! now! Ah well it was a decent movie. I wonder if their gonna do a sequel to it?

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  nowhere near as good as the cameron films, or hell, salvation was better too, but T3 has a charm to it, and i welcome it to the franchise.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  a very good movie and i enjoy watching this movie. it may not be the best of the series but its not the worst.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  This was a good movie but not as good asthe previous terminators. The effects should have stepped up more with a new century.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  Its one of the most unnecessary sequels ever made, but it still has some entertainment value in it, like the realistic action scenes.
  T2 left us with a great conclusion, they (Terminator, Sarah and John Connor) destroyed all traces of skynet including the liquid metal T1000.
  With the Terminator sacrificing himself for the sake of man kind.
  But there is no logical sense in T3 why skynet is still in business.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  10 years after Terminator 2, John Connor (Stahl) now lives 'off the grid'.
  SkyNet sends back a new robot, called T-X (Loken) which is more powerful than the T-1000. Her primary mission is to take out John Connor.
  However, another CSM-101 Terminator (Schwarzenegger) is also sent back to protect John against the T-X. John meets Kate Brewster (Danes), his future wife, and she joins him to stop the robots from taking over the world.
  
  We all knew that it wouldn't be as good as the first two movies when Cameron said he didn't want any part of it. We can't blame it all on Jonathan Mostow, he did an OK job directing it.
  The lack of character development bothers me. We never got to know anything about the T-X other than she was more advanced and powerful than the T-1000.
  The action scenes are intense, with impressive CGI and a great car chase that will keep you at the edge of your seat.
  I didn't get the same feeling at the end of the movie like I did with Terminator 2 & 3.
  Terminator 3 is an average action movie but it may feel like an unnecessary sequel.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  This is a film that speeds along at 100mph and 'wastes' no time creating any emotions, empathy, decent plot or any of the feelings that the previous two. You feel no emotions towards either of the two main humanm characters nor do you get the suspense and wonderfully made touch of the first two. However, there are some good points, Shwarzenegger is delightful as Terminator again and adrenaline junkies will love the non-stop action this film delivers. Its decent but its a long long long way off the first perfect two

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  It may not be Cameron, and it may be shallow, unispired, unoriginal, and a completely unnecessary addition to the Terminator franchise, this movie is still entetaining as hell. The action is stunning, the story, although woefully unoriginal, is interesting enough to make you care, and it gives the Austrian Death machine a chance to suit up in his trademark leather get-up and kick some cyborg ass one last time. I love you Arnold, me and every other advocate of action misses you.
  
  Anyway, this movie rocks. There are a few things that really drag it down (besides the reasons mentioned above). First off, Kristina Loken is atrociously bad as the evil terminator. She can't even pull off robotic acting well. Good looks cant cover a total lack of acting experience, and Kristina I beg of you, get the hell out of Hollywood, because you do not belong on the silver screen. Next, the opening credits suck ass. Look at the credits for the first two films. Not only are they awesome, but they may very well be two of the greatest opening credit sequences of all time. This movie just throws the title up there. No music, no build up, no thought whatsoever. Finally, the ending. The ending for this movie is terrrible. Some might say it's an appropriate ending, but it's contradictory of the two films that came before it. Still, all those gripes aside, this movie will have your heart pounding, and your surround sound speakers exploding out of their frames. It's no masterpiece, but it kicks ass nonetheless.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  Yes, this isn't T1 or T2, mainly due the fact that James Cameron didn't return for this movie, but hey, it's not bad. Without Arnold, this movie would've sucked. They were able to bring him back, even as he was in his 50's. The special effects are excellent as always. Overall, this is probably the dark horse of the franchise, but it's still what you expect from the series.

• Anonymous, 7 months ago

  

  Though wholly uninspired, and delivering neither the weight nor the greatness of either of the prior two, this is a well-done action flick that you should see if you're a fan of the series.