When in Rome2010

Сomments

• Anonymous, 12 days ago

  

  #llooll great movie like it , Some Sexy webcam girls at tommy4u.c()m

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Just saw it tonight for 3.00 Good thing I didn't pay full price cause it certainly wasn't worth it. Some really great actors i nthis film, but they were given nothing to work with

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Had some funny part's and i like the cast. teen's should like it.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  When in Rome (D)
  I've said it before, I'll say it again, romantic comedies are hard. The studios seem to think you just plug in 2 pretty faces and there ya go but films like this illustrate that that is not the case. "When in Rome" is the story of a young woman played by Kristen Bell, who discovers first hand the implications of removing coins placed in a magical fountain of love in Rome. All the lovelorn suitors who cast their coins into the water on a wish for true love become enchanted by Bell's character and all wind up back in New York attempting to win her affection. She genuinely likes Josh Duhamel ("Las Vegas") but thinks it might just be the fountain's spell that is drawing him to her. If that is already sounding dumb, it didn't get any better when they put in on film. Not very funny or cute or even romantic.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  When in Rome is the story of a young New Yorker named Beth (Kristen Bell) disillusioned with romance, takes a whirlwind trip to Rome where she defiantly plucks magic coins from fountain of love, inexplicably igniting the passion of an odd group of suitors: a sausage magnate (DANNY DEVITO), a street magician (JON HEDER), an adoring painter (WILL ARNETT) and a self-admiring model (DAX SHEPARD). But when a charming reporter (JOSH DUHAMEL) pursues her with equal zest, how will she know if his love is the real thing? This is the typical romantic comedy chick flick. It has some funny moments but in general the situations are kinda ridiculous and corny. The story is a little interesting but also very predictable. The locations are good , you can see beautiful landscapes from New York and Rome. It also has some nice music that fits good with the movie. The cast is pretty good but the performances of some of them are lame. Kristen Bell is decent, Josh Duhamel is also good, Will Arnett and Dax Sheppard are hilarious and Danny DeVito and Angelica Huston are convincing enough but the one that really disappoints me was Jon Heder, I know he is a really good comedian but his role as Chris Angel imitation was really disastrous. In conclusion, When in Rome can be entertaining but its not so don't waste your time watching this and if you still wanna see it, watch it on dvd.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  It sucked, the 2 main stars had no chemistry and hence caused the story became to boring to hold my interest

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Unforgettable...and God knows I tried. It's funny for the wrong reasons; pathetic dialogues and horrible acting.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Another movie watched for the sake of my daughter - she's worth it, but however the movie is not.
  
  Besides "Ugh, what a horrible movie!" - another thought came to mind while watching:
  
  "Who is Kristin Bell's agent and when can he/she be fired??"
  
  After smart, snappy Veronica Mars TV, why is she wasted in drivel like this and "Couples Retreat?"
  
  At least Pedro was cool. . .

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  When In Rome is every bit as bad as Valentine's Day - except it's at least the right length: 90 minutes. I thought I'd at least like Kristen Bell more than the usual female lead in a bad romantic comedy (because of Forgetting Sarah Marshall), but I must have been kidding myself.

• Anonymous, 6 months ago

  

  Lots of cliches in this movie overwhelmed it. Cute actors, but no substance to the plot at all. I would not waste the time or money to watch this one.